GLOBAL COUP D’ÉTAT | VOL. 1: A NEW NUREMBERG
Covid-19 has all the earmarks of a “plandemic.” Medical malpractice, scientific fraud, media propaganda, and government authoritarianism have all facilitated this global genocide. How should the people of Earth respond to this hostile takeover by the New World Order? Written by Ryan DeLarme and edited by Mouthy Buddha, GLOBAL COUP D’ÉTAT: VOL 1: A NEW NUREMBERG investigates the growing movement calling for international tribunals.
TRANSCRIPT & SOURCES
Two years into the COVID-19 authoritarian nightmare, in a September 2022 interview with 60 Minutes, Joe Biden declared that “The pandemic is over,” perhaps to the chagrin of the establishment media and even his own staff.
Outlets like NPR were quick to criticize his statement, insisting that at least 400 people were still dying of COVID-19 every day. However, many doubted these statistics as the criteria of what actually constitutes a “COVID death” seemed inconsistent at best, if not downright spurious. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, emphatically argued that the PCR test was never intended to diagnose infectious disease. We also have countless examples of politicians flouting their own Machiavellian rules, underpinning the tyranny with hypocrisy. These points, in addition to a slew of others, served to irrevocably fracture the official narrative.
The CDC has significantly eased up on its restrictions, but many people still wear masks and carry on as if this type of behavior really is the “new normal.” Fifteen days to slow the curve became a two-year sentence, and by the time the many of the lockdowns were lifted, COVID paranoia seemed to have ingrained itself into our society. However, not everyone surrendered to this campaign of fear.
Across the world, freedom-loving people decided to stand up for their rights and push back against what many saw as an excessive overreach. Others are taking things a step further.
Joe Biden and others may be ready to try and sweep the last two years under the rug, but a veritable army of physicians and lawyers is amassing which is not willing to let what they see as crimes against humanity go quietly into the night.
There are two prevailing narratives regarding the origin and purpose of SARS-CoV-2. The mainstream narrative, supported by a majority of the Intelligence Community, adamantly suggests that the outbreak was caused by “natural exposure to an animal infected with (SARS-CoV-2) or a close progenitor virus.” However, the preponderance of evidence points toward the Wuhan Institute of Virology as the probable origin. Some of the world’s most accomplished medical professionals, a coalition of legal experts, and diligent journalists across the world have compiled a compelling case that the pandemic is a man-made bioweapon, and that its plans and preparations began decades ago.
Although many of the leading voices of this movement are not in complete agreement about certain aspects of the so-called “plandemic,” there are many points of agreement:
- COVID-19 is a bioweapon and possibly the product of gain of function research paid for with our tax dollars.
- There are people in the US government as well as private individuals who had advanced knowledge of the pandemic.
- Through an intricate web of corporations and institutions, what has been referred to as the “pandemic virus industrial complex” has facilitated quite possibly the largest upward transfer of wealth in human history.
- The deeper purpose behind the pandemic is to consolidate power and move the world closer to global dictatorship.
There is a growing desire in people from all nations to see justice brought to the players who knowingly committed these mass crimes against humanity. Informed individuals are pushing for international investigations and subsequent tribunals, a movement that caused the phrase “Nuremberg 2.0” to trend on social media platforms.
Naturally, claims as bold as these require substantial evidence.
A physician named Jonathan Latham first introduced the phrase “pandemic virus industrial complex” during a lecture in January of 2021 on the various COVID-19 origin theories. He used the phrase to describe the academic, military, and commercial complexes that are driving the pandemic agenda and obscuring evidence demonstrating that SARS-CoV-2 is a manmade bioweapon.
Like the military-industrial complex, the pandemic virus industrial complex is a set of interlocking corporations and other institutions that support and reinforce each other.
Marion Koopmans, a Dutch virologist with the World Health Organization, has been a thorn in the side of WHO Director Tedros Ghebreyesus, one of the primary players in the emerging “global health” system. Koopmans has accused the WHO of undermining her research into the origins of COVID. Koopmans also claimed that the WHO has been planning ten years of infectious diseases to usher in rapid change, and that 2020 was only the start.
In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development describing a “coronavirus pandemic” that would result in worldwide tyranny. In the Foundation’s own words, in a section for a hypothetical future called “Lock Step” it mentions “A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.” It is worth mentioning that the Rockefeller Foundation has a history of backing population control mechanisms such as the eugenics movement in the early 20th century as well as the push for a genetically modified food system.
“We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage, to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.”
Between the years of 2017 and 2018, hundreds of millions of COVID-19 test kits were distributed worldwide. Of course, mainstream “fact-checkers” claim to have debunked this truth, but upon closer inspection, the “debunking” does not hold up under scrutiny. They claim that since the test kits weren’t labeled as being specifically for COVID-19 until after the outbreak was announced, the claims are untrue. However, the fact remains that those same test kits were eventually used to fuel and track the pandemic. If the elites and their pandemic industrial complex (PIC) were putting everything in place for this agenda, why would they risk the operation’s success by labeling the kits as being made for COVID-19?
On its own, this information might seem innocuous, but the devil is in the details.
In 2017, Anthony Fauci guaranteed that a “surprise outbreak” would occur within the next 4 years. Bill Gates echoed similar sentiments in an OpEd for Business Insider around the same time. Think about that, arguably the two biggest names associated with the pandemic industrial complex just happen to simultaneously predict a global pandemic as hundreds of millions of tests are distributed worldwide.
2017 must have been a big year for the burgeoning Pandemic Industrial Complex, as Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security also published a “futuristic scenario” describing a coronavirus pandemic that would emerge in Southeast Asia called SPARS.
One year before the coronavirus outbreak, a European virologist trained global leaders in the non-profit thinktank Chatham House, also known as the Royal Institute for International Affairs (the European arm of the Council on Foreign Relations) on how to ensure control over the public during a pandemic by creating fear through inflated death numbers, as well as how to manipulate the public into getting vaccinated. We see the continuation of this tactic today with assurances that “at least 400 people are still dying everyday”.
Six months before the coronavirus pandemic’s official start date, the Australian Government published a 230-page management plan for an influenza pandemic.
Five months before the pandemic officially hit, the World Health Organization was already instructing nations to prepare for such an event, saying that countries, donors, and multilateral institutions must be prepared for a “rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen.”
In the same month, the Global Vaccination Summit called for “strong surveillance systems” to ensure ongoing injections for the entire world population.
Four months before the pandemic, Bill Gates organized an exercise called Event 201 which simulated a worldwide coronavirus epidemic. An emphasis was put on “global business and government working together” and on censoring so-called “disinformation.”
In that same month, Fauci and HHS officials at the Milken Institutes Future of Health Summit discussed the need for a “global event” to “disrupt the system” thereby making the public more willing to accept an experimental mRNA shot. This required the CDC to literally change its definition of “vaccine,” which it even admitted to doing.
These are just a handful of examples of supporting evidence suggesting that this bioweapon was manmade, released intentionally, and planned long ago.
It’s little wonder why people around the world are calling for investigations and subsequent tribunals in the same fashion as the post-war Trials at Nuremberg. In fact, a coalition of doctors and lawyers have been making tremendous strides toward just that.
A German lawyer named Reiner Fuellmich, along with a multinational team of lawyers, are pursuing legal proceedings against the CDC, WHO, and the Davos globalists for crimes against humanity. Fuellmich is an expert on international law, corruption cases and medical law, and has a history of successfully suing larger-than-life corporations, including Volkswagen and Deutsche Bank.
Fuellmich and company are working with a vast group of “expert witnesses” who have observed the creation and implementation of this “plandemic.” The group is made of World Health Organization advisors, a United Nations official, members of British Intelligence Services, former officers from the U.S. and U.K. military, an expert from the Centers for Disease Control, the former vice-president of Pfizer, a Nobel prize winner for medicine, and many other high-level witnesses.
Realistically, this will not be an easy battle. Just because there’s a group of lawyers and doctors attempting to prosecute and expose the pandemic virus industrial complex doesn’t mean we should get complacent. There is a high chance that these efforts will be sabotaged from within, after all, we’re talking about bringing charges against some of the most powerful individuals and institutions on the planet.
How would we even approach something of this magnitude? With an astronomical number of accused culprits and the international nature of the pandemic, how could we even begin to work this out legally?
While the situation is unprecedented, there is a similar event in our recent history, albeit of a much smaller scale, that we can look to: the Nuremberg Trials in the wake of the second world war.
The Nuremberg Trials were a series of international prosecutions that decided the fate of many Nazi war criminals, who faced charges of crimes against peace, crimes of war, and crimes against humanity. These trials would become the first of their kind in history.
The trials at Nuremberg were administered by the United States, Great Britain, Soviet Russia, and France. However, each of these countries had its own laws and legal systems. Since they couldn’t try each defendant in 4 different ways, they created the London Charter of the International Military Tribunal.
It was agreed that the defendants would stand trial and be allowed their own defense attorneys. Instead of a single judge presiding over 177 individuals simultaneously, there would be a tribunal with 4 judges, one from each allied country.
The trials at Nuremberg lasted from 1945-1949, but the most high-profile cases would be brought in the first year.
Like our current predicament, it wasn’t just military personnel on trial, but politicians, CEOs, architects, publishers, and scientists, as well.
The Nuremberg trials had lofty intentions and aims, but these ambitions failed to come to fruition. There is a school of thought which sees the tribunals as a failed attempt to bring to justice powerful forces behind the scenes on both sides of the Atlantic among industrialists and financiers who helped Hitler to assume power and build the German war machine. What’s more, the United States not only failed to deliver justice to some of Nazi Germany’s most nefarious scientists, but actually imported them into the country and assimilated them into the military industrial complex under Operation Paperclip.
We like to think that all the horror stories regarding human experimentation are attributed only to other countries and are safely contained in the past, but that is far from the truth. In fact, some of the most heinous experimentation these Nazi scientists would ever take part in occurred after Nuremberg, on US soil and at the behest of the United States government.
A careful review of the activities of the CIA and the organizations from which it sprang reveals an intense preoccupation with the development of techniques of behavior control, brainwashing, and covert medical and psychic experimentation on unwitting subjects including religious sects, ethnic minorities, prisoners, mental patients, soldiers, and the terminally ill.
The chilling similarities between these CIA experiments and those of the Nazis shouldn’t come as surprise. Efforts of US intelligence officers to acquire the records of Nazi experiments led to the recruiting of the Nazi researchers themselves and subsequently put them to work, essentially transferring the laboratories from Dachau, the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, Auschwitz, and Buchenwald to Edgewood Arsenal, Fort Detrick, Huntsville Air Force Base, Ohio State, and the University of Washington.
Operation Paperclip wasn’t the only way that Nuremberg failed. It was hoped that the International Military Tribunals (IMT) would establish a precedent punishing and deterring crimes against peace in the future, but a number of authors, including Nigerian author and economist Kingsley Moghalu, believe that this approach “did not achieve its ultimate and unrealistic goal of deterring aggression with the specter of accountability.” This is perhaps most blatantly evidenced by many wars, atrocities, and endless conflicts seen across the world since Nuremberg.
While calls for international investigations into the origins of COVID-19 and subsequent Nuremberg-style tribunals have been mounting worldwide, many doubt that it is even possible to prosecute the powers that be when their control over society seems to be absolute. Will the world see justice for the largest genocide in human history? Perhaps, despite the tyranny and suffering, there is cause for humanity to kindle hope that we will soon unite and reject the “new normal.”