ORDER OUT OF CHAOS | VOL. 3: WIRETAP

June 3, 2023 MouthyBuddha

Far from being isolated events, the false flag attacks on September 11 were one chapter of a long coup on the American republic and a shadow war that rages on to the present. How is 9/11 connected to January 6, Russiagate, and Spygate? Written by Adam Riva and edited by Mouthy Buddha, ORDER OUT OF CHAOS VOL 3: WIRETAP investigates the key players that were involved in the War on Terror and their connections to Mossad and other adversaries.

TRANSCRIPT & SOURCES

In September of 2006, one of the world’s leading experts on controlled demolitions, Danny Jowenko, was shown footage of the collapse of WTC building 7 by a Dutch filmmaker. Unlike the Twin Towers, Building 7 was not hit by a plane, although it collapsed into its own footprint at near-freefall speed and was conspicuously omitted by the official 9/11 Commission Report.

Jowenko’s raw reaction to the footage was marked by an immediate conviction that the 47-story skyscraper was brought down by controlled explosives, rather than by fire as FEMA asserted.  In fact, that would make Building 7 the third steel-framed skyscraper in history to collapse from fire, the first two being the Twin Towers. Disturbingly, at 4:54pm EST, the BBC reported that Building 7 had collapsed, 26 minutes before it actually did. The building is clearly visible and intact behind the news reporter claiming it had fallen.

Danny Jowenko quickly became a vocal opponent to the official narrative. It was his expert opinion that inspired former Director of Studies at the US Army War College, Dr. Alan Sabrosky, to become skeptical as well. In 2010, Sabrosky concluded that Building 7 was a controlled demolition, mainly because Jowenko’s testimony affirmed what Sabrosky had been hearing privately in intelligence circles.

In an article entitled Treason, Betrayal and Deceit: 9/11 and Beyond, Sabrosky asserted,

“Only two intelligence agencies had the expertise, assets, access and political protection to execute 9/11 in the air and on the ground: our CIA and Israel’s Mossad.”

On July 16, 2011, three days after giving a radio interview about the controlled demolition of Building 7, Jowenko was killed on the way home from church when his car accelerated into a frontal-collision with a tree in the village of Serooskerke, Netherlands. His dog was with him in the vehicle but survived the crash.

According to News War’s coverage of the incident,

“The man was trapped in his car. Four fire engines and an ambulance rushed to the scene, but it turned out that the rescuers could do nothing for the victim. After two hours of investigation by the police, the car was finally towed. While all this time the victim remained in the vehicle during the entire investigation. His body was taken to a different location onwards.”

Dr. Sabrosky explained how he had heard of 9/11’s ties to the CIA and Mossad in intelligence circles, and that Jowenko’s analysis affirmed this as true. Dr. Sabrosky drew attention to an important policy paper from 1996 that was written for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu titled “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm”. The document advocated for the destabilization of Syria and Iraq – something the Bush administration would later accomplish with the declaration of an unconstitutional war justified by FBI Director Robert Mueller’s blatant lies about weapons of mass destruction.

“Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq, an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions.”

The authors of this paper later became key members of George Bush’s foreign policy team, almost all of whom were members of the neoconservative thinktank Project for a New American Century, or PNAC. The thinktank included Richard Perle who was Chairman of President George W. Bush’s Defense Policy Advisory Committee until 2004, and Douglas Feith who was Bush’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. 

PNAC, founded in 1997, declared that a large-scale terror attack on American soil would be necessary to accomplish their objective of bringing about a global American empire. In a 90-page report published by PNAC in September 2000 called Rebuilding America’s Defenses, the authors wrote,

“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor.”

On March 10, 2003, ABC News published an article titled Were 1998 Memos a Blueprint for War?

“In open letters to Clinton and GOP congressional leaders the next year, the group called for “the removal of Saddam Hussein’s regime from power” and a shift toward a more assertive U.S. policy in the Middle East, including the use of force if necessary to unseat Saddam.”

The article points out that of the 18 people who signed the letters, 10 went on to serve in the Bush administration.

Ian Lustick, a Middle East expert at the University of Pennsylvania, told ABC News,

“After 9/11, [PNAC] was able to benefit from the gigantic eruption of political capital, combined with the supply of military preponderance in the hands of the president. And this small group, therefore, was able to gain direct contact and even control, now, of the White House.”

Other instrumental figures in PNAC included Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Dick Cheney, George Bush Sr., George Bush Jr., John Kerry, John Bolton, Loretta Lynch, Jeh Johnson, Donald Rumsfeld, George Soros, and Jacob Rothschild. When 9/11 truthers call the attacks “an inside job,” they don’t mean the attacks were exclusively carried out by Americans, but a roster like this certainly reads like a “who’s who” of Deep State assets who were instrumental in 9/11 and the subsequent War on Terror.

Michael Chertoff, who served in the Department of Justice Criminal Division after Bush Jr. took office, advocated for the detention of the hundreds of detained Israeli spies arrested before and shortly after 9/11, including the High-Fivers that we profiled in Volume Two of this series. Chertoff co-authored the Patriot Act which was used on the Israeli spies to deny them due process and access to attorneys, family members, and consulates.

They were eventually deported back to Israel, despite protestations from civil liberties groups. The Patriot Act was the perfect cover to keep a lid on Israeli involvement because it allowed Chertoff and the Bush administration to seem tough on terrorism while preventing any leaks. Chertoff later became Secretary of Homeland Security.

The ACLU explained how he also weaponized the FBI against ordinary Americans in a clear violation of the law.

“He also reportedly came up with the idea of revising internal guidelines at DOJ to allow the FBI to send undercover agents into religious, social and political gatherings without evidence of wrongdoing.”

In the words of US Senator Bob Graham, Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, in an interview on NewsHour with Jim Lehrer on December 11, 2002,

“I think there is very compelling evidence that at least some of the terrorists were assisted not just in financing — although that was part of it — by a sovereign foreign government… It will become public at some point when it’s turned over to the archives, but that’s 20 or 30 years from now.”

On December 21, 2001, Executive Intelligence Review published an article titled Israeli Spying in U.S. Expose´ Cracks Coverup Of Sept. 11 [backup]. This paper discusses in greater detail the Israeli spy ring that had been discovered prior to 9/11 – the largest foreign spy ring ever busted on US soil. The article first draws our attention to Amdocs, an Israeli company that had 90% control over the American telecom industry circa 2001.

“Amdocs has the contracts with the 25 largest telephone companies in the United States to handle all of their directory assistance, calling-record, and billing work, which gives Amdocs real-time access to nearly every telephone in the country, including records of phone calls.”

Fox News ran coverage of Amdocs on December 12, 2001. According to the report,

“What worries some U.S. investigators is the possibility Amdocs data may be obtained by Israeli organized crime… It would not be the first time. In 1997 there was a huge problem that was hushed up when FBI, Secret Service, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and Los Angeles Police Department telecommunications were ‘completely compromised by Israeli organized crime,’ using the very data that Amdocs tracks.”

A coverup was actively underway at the highest levels of American intelligence as Amdocs had previously been investigated by the FBI for ties to the Israeli mafia, but the company was allowed to continue with business as usual. By 1999, the National Security Agency issued a Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmentalized Information (TS/SCI) report, warning that all American phone records were getting into the hands of foreign governments—particularly the Israeli government.

The heavily redacted report in the NSA archives states that James Clapper was on the panel who produced this report. Clapper went on to serve as Director of National Intelligence from 2010 up until Donald Trump was inaugurated as president on January 20, 2017. Clapper, along with FBI Director James Comey and CIA Director John Brennan briefed President Obama and Vice President Biden in August of 2016 that Hillary Clinton was working to falsely frame Donald Trump of Russian collusion.

Knowing that Comey lied under oath to coverup Obama spying on the Trump campaign, that Clapper, Comey, and Brennan were integral players in the Russiagate hoax, combined with the fact that Robert Mueller was leading the Russia collusion investigation, as well as Liz Cheney leading the January 6^th Hearings, it becomes abundantly clear that many of the same Deep State figures and families connected to the 9/11 attacks and the War on Terror were also involved in trying to take down Donald Trump. With these facts in mind, the reality of a decades-long coup on the United States of America begins to emerge.

In 2016, just a few months prior to the election, FBI Director James Comey refused to prosecute Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton for using BleachBit to destroy 33,000 emails and destroying devices with hammers after she was subpoenaed for sending classified intelligence with her personal email while serving as Secretary of State.

Moreover, President Bill Clinton transformed wiretapping in America in 1994 with the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) by enlisting Comverse Infosys, another Israeli-owned company. Comverse Infosys now goes by the name Verint Systems.

According to Executive Intelligence Review,

“Using Comverse software, law enforcement agencies use computers and software that tap into the elaborate nationwide system of telephone switchers and routers, and grab the targeted phone conversations into computers and transmit them to investigators authorized to do the wiretaps. Comverse manages and maintains the computers and the software, giving them potential access to all of the data.”

Once again, we learn that the usual suspects were warned about Comverse Infosys but nothing was done about it. John Ashcroft, who was Attorney General under George W. Bush, and Robert Mueller, who lied about WMDs in Iraq and led the investigation into Trump’s alleged ties to Russia, were both warned on October 18^th about the weaknesses of electronic surveillance capabilities at that time. Fifteen local, state, and federal law enforcement officials hand-delivered the letter to Ashcroft and Mueller, but it was effectively ignored.

According to a 2008 Counter Punch article,

“The fact of the vulnerability of our telecom backbone is indisputable,” says a high level U.S. intelligence officer who has monitored the fears among federal agents.  “How it came to pass, why nothing has been done, who has done what – these are the incendiary questions.”

According to Fox News, the thing that worried investigators most was that in New York, many suspects “altered their behavior dramatically” as if they had been tipped off after wire taps were put in place. Both Amdocs and Comverse had previously been implicated in the sale of telephone data which compromised US investigations into drug running.

“In Israel… Comverse works so closely with the government that the Ministry of Industry and Trade (formerly headed by Ariel Sharon) pays 50% of the firm’s R&D costs. “But investigators within the DEA, INS, and FBI,” Fox noted, “have all told Fox News that to pursue, or even suggest Israeli spying through Comverse is considered career suicide.”

On the day of 9/11, Comverse owned another company named Odigo, which had offices near the WTC and provided services for various “instant message” systems on the internet. All three companies – Amdocs, Comverse Infosys, and Odigo – stem from technology originating in Unit 8200, an Israeli Intelligence Corps unit in the Israeli Defense Force.

Peter Roberts, senior research fellow at Britain’s Royal United Services Institute, characterized Unit 8200 as “probably the foremost technical intelligence agency in the world and stand on a par with the NSA in everything except scale.”

“In Israel, Fox reported, Comverse works so closely with the government that the Ministry of Industry and Trade (formerly headed by Ariel Sharon) pays 50% of the firm’s R&D costs. “But investigators within the DEA, INS, and FBI,” Fox noted, “have all told Fox News that to pursue, or even suggest Israeli spying through Comverse is considered career suicide.”

According to the Israeli news service Haaretz,

“…two of its workers received messages two hours before the Twin Towers attack on September 11 predicting the attack would happen, and the company has been cooperating with Israeli and American law enforcement, including the FBI, in trying to find the original sender of the message predicting the attack.”

Odigo was not the only Israeli-owned company near the WTC that seemingly had foreknowledge of the attacks. As we reviewed in Volume Two of this series, two former CIA officers have confirmed that “movers’ vans are a common intelligence cover.” Interestingly, ZIM, an Israeli state-owned shipping company, had a 10,000 square foot office in the North Tower which was vacated on September 4, 2001. ZIM broke its lease, and it forfeited its $50,000 security deposit.

Not only did the BBC report on the collapse of Building 7 on live TV before the building actually collapsed, it also conveniently had former Prime Minister Ehud Barak available for remarks within an hour of the first building collapse. Barak dismissed the possibility that anyone could have had foreknowledge of the attacks, despite the fact that Israeli intelligence officials admitted that they warned the CIA in August of 2001 “that large-scale terrorist attacks on highly-visible targets on the American mainland were imminent,” as reported by Telegraph on September 16, 2001.

Ehud Barak also blamed Osama bin Laden, fully endorsed the American intelligence community, and promptly called for a massive global military deployment. His words and ideas seem suspiciously aligned with the Project for a New American Century. As a side note, it is worth mentioning that Ehud Barak enjoyed a very close relationship with billionaire child trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. The Wall Street Journal described him as “a regular guest.”

Despite leaders of the West and other prominent heads of state trying to pin the terror attacks on Osama bin Laden, bin Laden denied any role and instead asserted that it was a false flag attack planned and executed by a shadowy cabal in the United States. Although bin Laden is on record multiple times denying involvement in 9/11, one quote in particular has been buried and forgotten about.

On September 28, 2001, Karachi, a Pakistani publication, featured an interview with bin Laden that was translated by the BBC World Monitoring Service Urdu to English the following day. For some time, the translated interview was featured in BBC digital news archives. Here are two excerpts from that interview.

“The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the US system, but are dissenting against it. Or those who are working for some other system; persons who want to make the present century as a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity so that their own civilization, nation, country, or ideology could survive. They can be any one, from Russia to Israel and from India to Serbia. In the US itself, there are dozens of well-organized and well-equipped groups, which are capable of causing a large-scale destruction.

…whether it is President Bush or any other US president, they cannot bring Israel to justice for its human rights abuses or to hold it accountable for such crimes. What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked as to who made the attacks.”

Will the awakening masses choose to confront political mythologies purveyed by men in high towers? Perhaps the recondite nature of large-scale geopolitical machinations will forever remain elusive to the general public, affording the architects of control cart blanche to steamroll through their totalitarian aspirations. Is the will of the people enough to reign in the predator class? If we are to win the War on Terror, we must first recognize that the true terrorists do not wield box cutters, they wield mainstream media. They do not hide in dark caves; they walk the corridors of power.