ORDER OUT OF CHAOS | VOL. 2: THE HIGH-FIVERS

September 8, 2022 MouthyBuddha

Who were the “high-fivers” and how did they know ahead of time that the World Trade Center would be attacked on September 11th? Why did the White House intervene to block their prosecution? Why is it that so many so-called “art students” who had foreknowledge of the attacks were connected to Mossad? Written by Adam Riva and edited by Mouthy Buddha, ORDER OUT OF CHAOS VOL 2: THE HIGH-FIVERS investigates the true culprits behind the most notorious false flag attack in modern history, how they engineered it, and how they got away with it.

TRANSCRIPT & SOURCES

At approximately 8:00am the morning of September 11, 2001, police began to receive reports of a white Chevrolet van with “middle-eastern” men outside an apartment complex in New Jersey who were videotaping the disaster at the WTC, high-fiving each other with glee, and posing for photographs in front of the wreckage. (HA’ARETZ 9/17/01)

“Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial impact. Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken, and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City parking lot.” (Yediot America 11/2/01)

“They were like happy, you know … They didn’t look shocked to me,” said a witness.

After concerned locals alerted police about the celebration, the FBI decided to get involved.

At 3:31pm, the FBI issued a nationwide “be on lookout” alert for help finding the van.

“It read: “Vehicle possibly related to New York terrorist attack. White, 2000 Chevrolet van with New Jersey registration with ‘Urban Moving Systems’ sign on back seen at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the time of first impact of jetliner into World Trade Center.”

The FBI alert continued,

“Three individuals with van were seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosion. FBI Newark Field Office requests that, if the van is located, hold for prints and detain individuals.”

The police received several leads which led to them shutting down all inbound traffic on New York’s bridges and tunnels. By 4:30pm, Bergen County police apprehended the vehicle on Route 3 in East Rutherford.

“A radio transmission from Channel 30, one of the emergency communications channels in NYC, reported on the discovery of a van full of explosives and two suspects located between 6th and 7th on King Street, some blocks away from the World Trade Center.”

From the police chatter, we learn that the van contained a mural of a plane flying into the Twin Towers (audio starts at 05:15). Although no photographs of the mural are in circulation, there is a mockup that resembles the original that was created by an artist.

“I got a message on that plane, it’s a big truck with a mural painted of a… of an airplane diving into New York City and exploding.”

This ominous detail about the mural on the side of the truck was corroborated in 2003 by the Mineta Transportation Institute’s report entitled Saving City Lifelines: Lessons Learned in the 9-11 Terrorist Attacks.

Page 20 of the report reads,

“A panel truck with a painting of a plane flying into the World Trade Center was stopped near the temporary command post. It proved to be rented to a group of ethnic Middle Eastern people who did not speak English. Fearing that it might be a truck bomb, the NYPD immediately evacuated the area, called out the bomb squad, and detained the occupants until a thorough search was made.”

The day following the attacks, the New Jersey Bergen Record, devoted its cover page to the High Fivers with an article entitled Five Men Detained as Suspected Conspirators. It is reported that the High Fivers were apprehended at 4:30 pm, about 8 hours after the Twin Towers were attacked.

“There are maps of the city in the car with certain places highlighted,” the source said. “It looked like they’re hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park.”

Mayor Giuliani and the police commissioner discussed this incident with press. CNN and ABC also reported on the arrests. However, to this day, there remain inconsistent reports on key details of the High Fivers.

According to a 2002 article by Mike King on WhatReallyHappened.com,

“What’s really intriguing is that ABC’s 20/20 (15), the New York Post (16), and the New Jersey Bergen Record (17) all clearly and unambiguously reported that a white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3, which leads directly to the Lincoln Tunnel.

But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz Sheva) (18), and Yediot America, (19) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that a white van with Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington Bridge, which is several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.

It appears as if there may actually have been two white vans involved, one stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the conflicting reports as to the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so many credible eye-witnesses all saw celebrating “middle-easterners” in a white van in so many different locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon (lawyer for the 5 Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but later increased the total to five.”

WhatReallyHappened.com also reported that the van contained tonnes of explosives.

“…two suspects are in FBI custody after a truckload of explosives was discovered around the George Washington Bridge … The FBI … says enough explosives were in the truck to do great damage to the George Washington Bridge.”

Other reports announced that the van contained no such explosives.

Perhaps conflicting reports of vans, suspects, locations, and explosives are forgivable considering the calamity of the day’s events. However, suspicious details of the men, including how one member was carrying $4,000 in cash and another member had two distinct passports, were revealed on October 8, 2001 by the New York Times.

“What those early news accounts missed, however, was that all five of the men were Israeli Jews, and that if they had box cutters, it was because at least four of them and possibly all five worked for Urban Moving Systems, a household moving company in New York and New Jersey.”

URBAN MOVING SYSTEMS

On December 11, 2001, Fox News acknowledged that these Israelis were officially part of the FBI’s 9/11 investigation.

“A highly placed investigator told Fox News there are ‘tie-ins,’ but when asked for details flatly refused to describe them. ‘Evidence linking these Israelis to 9-11 is classified, I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It is classified information,’ the source said.”

Fox ran a 4-part investigative series into the spy ring which, at the time, was the most comprehensive and high-profile exposure this story received. The FBI investigation revealed that this Israeli spy ring was by far the largest foreign spy ring ever busted in America.

On March 15, 2002 the magazine Jewish Daily Forward ran an article entitled Spy Rumors Fly on Gusts of Truth. From the article, we learn the names of the High Fivers: Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, Oded Ellner, Omer Marmari, and Yaron Shmuel.

“The FBI came to the conclusion… that the five Israelis arrested in New Jersey last September were conducting a Mossad surveillance mission and that their employer, Urban Moving Systems of Weehawken, N.J., served as a front.

According to the Bergen Record,

“Business records show an Urban Moving Systems with offices on West 50th Street in Manhattan and on West 18th Street in Weehawken.”

Just to recap, we have 5 suspects who celebrated the WTC attack, were arrested in 1 or 2 vans which possibly contained explosives, either near the Lincoln Tunnel or the George Washington Bridge or both. The vehicles belonged to Urban Moving Systems which the FBI concluded was a front for a Mossad spy ring. At least one of the vehicles featured a mural of a plane crashing into the WTC.

Urban Moving Systems was owned and operated by an Israeli businessman named Dominick Otto Suter. The FBI searched the offices of Urban Moving Systems and questioned Suter. However, upon returning shortly after for a second round of questioning they found that Suter had fled back to Israel on September 14^th, before he could be questioned any further, leaving behind cell phones and thousands of dollars in the office. Suter fled the country so abruptly that customers of Urban Moving Systems were left with their furniture stranded in storage facilities. Eventually, Dominick Suter appeared on the May 2002 FBI Suspect List along with the 19 hijackers and a few other suspected extremists.

According to Jewish Daily Forward,

“Earlier this year, the New York State Department of Transportation revoked Urban Moving System’s license after discovering that the company’s midtown Manhattan base was only a mailing address.

After they returned to Israel at the end of November, the five men told local media that they were kept in solitary confinement, beaten, deprived of food and questioned while blindfolded and in their underwear.”

On June 22, 2001, 81 days before September 11, Urban Moving Systems received a one-time payment of $498,750 from the Federal Government Assistance Program. It remains unknown how this loan was used by the business.

Thousands of pages of investigations into the High-Fivers conducted by the FBI, CIA, and DOJ were eventually declassified, albeit heavily redacted. The FBI report contains large, redacted sections that will remain classified until 2030-2035. A total of 76 pictures found on the Israelis’ camera were featured in the FBI’s report but again, they were cropped and redacted. One picture even showed Sivan Kurzberg holding a lighter up with the WTC burning in the background.

On page 7 of the FBI report, it is confirmed that there was explosive residue and a bomb suit found inside the van.

As reported on 21^st Century Wire, the Urban Moving Systems vans deviated far from their scheduled delivery routes the morning of the attacks.

“According to the declassified FBI files, the schedule for September 11^th, 2001 “did not include any pickups or deliveries outside of New Jersey.” The two Israelis “were stopped while traveling in the direction of the site of the hijacked plane that crashed outside of Pittsburgh, PA.”

On page 36 of the report, the FBI details how there was reportedly a shared hatred of America amongst the Urban Moving Systems’ staff.

“A former Urban Moving Systems employee later contacted the Newark Division with information indicating that he had quit his employment with Urban Moving Systems due to high amount of anti-American sentiment present among Urban’s employees. The former employee stated that an Israeli employee of Urban had even once remarked, “Give us 20 years and we’ll take over your media and destroy your country.”

According to a Counter Punch article published on March 7, 2007,

“They were held for 71 days in a federal detention center in Brooklyn, New York, during which time they were repeatedly interrogated by FBI and CIA counterterrorism teams, who referred to the men as the “high-fivers” for their celebratory behavior on the New Jersey waterfront. Some were placed in solitary confinement for at least forty days; some were given as many as seven lie detector tests. One of the Israelis, Paul Kurzberg, brother of Sivan, refused to take a lie-detector test for ten weeks. Then he failed it.”

The F.B.I would later state that it was pressured by Washington and the State Department to deport the Israelis based on their immigration status. It should also be noted that the United States Justice Department destroyed its copies of the photographs on January 27, 2014.

Investigative researcher Chris Ketcham claims to have spoken with a former CIA counterterrorism officer about the sudden release of the detainees. The officer told him,

“There was no question but that [the order to close down the investigation] came from the White House. It was immediately assumed at CIA headquarters that this basically was going to be a cover-up so that the Israelis would not be implicated in any way in 9/11.”

According to an article authored by Ketcham,

“…The Forward reported that the FBI finally concluded that at least two of the detained Israelis were agents working for the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, and that Urban Moving Systems, the ostensible employer of the five Israelis, was a front operation. This was confirmed by two former CIA officers, and they noted that movers’ vans are a common intelligence cover.”

After returning to their home country, the High Fivers appeared on a national television program where they claimed they were in America to document the attacks.

“The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event.”

This, of course, begs the question: How did the High Fivers have foreknowledge of the event?

ISRAELI ART STUDENTS

On June 3, 2002, The Telegraph ran an article entitled US arrests 200 young Israelis in spying investigation in which they explain how a leaked DEA report revealed that the FBI and other federal agencies had arrested and deported hundreds of Israelis for espionage. The document was classified for senior officials, but someone who apparently didn’t trust senior officials, leaked it to the press. The report, coming from the DEA’s Office of Security Programs, explained how at least 140 Israelis who had been arrested beginning in March 2001 were posing as art students. The FBI was about halfway through the process of rounding up this spy ring, and then September 11^th happened.

On May 7, 2002, Salon had detailed the scope of this Israeli spy ring and several disturbing revelations about their activities.

“In March 2001, the Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive (NCIX), a branch of the CIA, issued a heads-up to federal employees about “suspicious visitors to federal facilities.”

In the wake of the NCIX bulletin, federal officials raised several other red flags, including an Air Force alert, a Federal Protective Services alert, an Office of National Drug Control Policy security alert and a request that the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) investigate a specific case.”

“Reports of the mysterious Israelis with an inexplicable interest in peddling art to G-men came in from more than 40 U.S. cities and continued throughout the first six months of 2001. Agents of the DEA, ATF, Air Force, Secret Service, FBI, and U.S. Marshals Service documented some 130 separate incidents of “art student” encounters. Some of the Israelis were observed diagramming the inside of federal buildings. Some were found carrying photographs they had taken of federal agents. One was discovered with a computer printout in his luggage that referred to “DEA groups.””

In its report, the DEA even described the spy ring as an “organized intelligence gathering activity.” Despite all these red flags, The Telegraph reported that there was no evidence linking any of those arrested to the attacks of September 11^th.

“The DEA report said most of the students questioned by American investigators acknowledged having served in units of the Israeli armed forces specialising in military intelligence, electronic signals interception or explosive ordinance.”

“It added that one person questioned was the son of an Israeli general, another had served as the bodyguard to the head of the Israeli Army and a third served in a Patriot missile unit.”

As if these revelations were not shocking enough, it was discovered that several of the so-called “art students” lived in Hollywood, FL, the city where Mohammed Atta and three other terrorists who were involved with 9/11 lived.

As Justin Raimondo of Antiwar.com remarked in 2007,

“This is potentially one of the most important 9/11-related stories ever reported, and yet the number of serious investigative pieces done on it can hardly be counted on the fingers of one hand.”

On June 21, 2002, ABC’s 20/20 published an article entitled Were Israelis Detained on Sept. 11 Spies? The article revealed that when the van belonging to the cheering Israelis was stopped by the police, the driver of the van immediately told the officers,

“We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem.”

Why did he feel Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD?

The Washington Times published an article examining a paper by the Army School of Advanced Military Studies that advocated for US intervention to bring peace to the Middle East. In the article, it described Mossad as,

“Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.”

The Washington Times published this article on the eve of infamy, September 10, 2001.

Who exactly were the “high-fivers” and how did they know ahead of time that the World Trade Center would be attacked on September 11^th? Why did the White House intervene to block their prosecution once they were apprehended by authorities? How does one interpret these discrepancies? At what point will we get real answers?

Regardless of the turnout, one has to remain committed to pursuing truth, no matter how dangerous this pursuit is. It is almost certainly a fact that the “high-fivers” had something to do with the attacks – to what degree remains a mystery – but one thing is certain, groups like Mossad and the intelligence that surrounds them should not be above scrutiny. Only when we hold their feet to the fire can an understanding of their intentions emerge, to find order amongst the chaos, to find peace out of evil.